On my way to the Saturday sessions of the New England Political Science Association meeting, I listened to the Governor’s weekly radio address and Senator Phil Bartlett’s response from the Democratic party. First, let me say that it is possibly … Continue reading
No, I mean literally…I’ll be talking about the Maine legislature and Maine politics in general on MPBN’s Maine Calling today at 12:15. Listen live or stream on-demand at MPBN.net.
What does it mean to trust? One of my favorite, counter-intuitive definitions of the term comes from Margaret Levi and Laura Stoker’s 2000 Annual Review of Political Science article which identifies “trust” as an individual “making herself vulnerable to another … Continue reading
Reading yesterday’s New York Times story on Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty (as well as general coverage of the failure of the Buffett Rule) made me think about the problem of women’s effort to obtain the vote in the US. I … Continue reading
So, we live just outside of Waterville, a town in possession of a mid-size Marden’s — a store famous both for purveying racks and racks of extraordinarily cheap, smoke-scented (and sometimes water-stained) salvage goods and for being our governor’s former employer. I am an enthusiastic customer. Recently, Marden’s was selling acres of paperbacks for $1.00 a book, bringing me back to my days of living near the Strand bookstore in New York and going book-shopping on the weekends with several strong shoulder bags in tow.
In addition to a dollar copy of the Pelopennesian War and a collection of Kafka, I grabbed some more contemporary denizens of the dollar bin including AJ Jacobs’ My Life as An Experiment. Among Jacobs’ experiments is a brief effort to live his life entirely rationally, in response to the last decade’s wave of pop cognitive science that points out all of the ways that we behave irrationally. It was cute.
However, Jacobs’ experiment reminded me that in our political discourse we continue to attempt this experiment despite the fact that it’s pretty clear that rationality is not what drives a lot of political action. Unless I get distracted, which is not unlikely, I’m going to try to review the current state of scholarship about the role of emotion in political decision-making periodically over the next few weeks on this site.
We’ll start with George Lakoff, who’s made it his mission to encourage us to give up on the dream of rational politics. An excellent start.
I took some students to hear the Maine Supreme Judicial Court oral arguments yesterday. We caught some of Jackson v. North East Insurance and then stayed for the real target of our visit, Nolan v. Labree et al., a case where … Continue reading
James O’Keefe is apparently continuing to work hard to convince Americans that their voting systems are insecure. His newest effort follows hot on the heels of his “success” in New Hampshire and his well-publicized efforts to discredit the DHHS system … Continue reading